<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.valueinvestingnews.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Value Investing News - FRE - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/stock-tickers/fre</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;FRE&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Re: Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Buyout</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/warren-buffett-tells-cnbc-treasury-did-exactly-right-thing-f#comment-1791</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;...if Bear Stearns was an 8.5 on the Richter, the financial Richter scale, this was about a 9.9 or something of the sort,&amp;quot; commented Buffett. I new this event was very significant, but I&#039;m suprised to see Buffett give it a 9.9 out of I&#039;m assume 10. I&#039;m really surprised to see that everything is still holding together today in the markets. Some hedge funds must have blown up on this one.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 10:26:03 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1791 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Great post, you did a hell</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/fannie-freddie-and-preparing-black-swans#comment-1790</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Great post, you did a hell of a lot of research.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:41:31 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mrt253</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1790 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>George,  Sears may not have</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/witney-tilson-sears-video#comment-1495</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;George,  Sears may not have a moat in the traditional sense (ie. USG has a pretty large moat on Sheetrock products, Walmart has a moat on its economy of scale )but is it possible  that they have a moat in their land holdings. I know that this is a fairly common argument among Sears shareholders, in other words, that Sears holds 1/5 of the mall space in America but that is fairly large for one retailer. hmmm....I guess i&#039;m just stuck between its assets and its &quot;failing&quot; business.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:56:36 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>rwmcpar</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1495 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>SHLD is not a DCF stock, it</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/witney-tilson-sears-video#comment-1492</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;SHLD is not a DCF stock, it is an asset play, both land and brand values.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;http://www.contrarianvalueinvesting.com/&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:51:11 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>alexg</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1492 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>No Sears in the Fat Pitch</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/witney-tilson-sears-video#comment-1491</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;No Sears in the Fat Pitch Financials Port since it has no moat.&amp;nbsp;Buffett has noted&amp;nbsp;that when a good management meets a bad business, it is the reputation of the business that generally prevails.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:49:14 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1491 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I just hope everyone doesn&#039;t</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/witney-tilson-sears-video#comment-1490</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I just hope everyone doesn&#039;t have a bad case of goupthink on sears. I don&#039;t really care how smart Lampert  is, Sears Holdings its still a failing business and until it starts getting some positive cash flow its still a dicey one.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:19:46 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>rwmcpar</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1490 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Reply</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/blog/bridge-street/bridge-street-journal-3-13#comment-1118</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Although GS will come out a major winner lets not forget that they managed to be only one step ahead. While Wall Street was talking about CDOs they just recognized that it was bad and took it one step further. BRK on the other hand has maintained a level of standard that is unparalleled. I think it goes to show the incredible restraint that Buffet and Co. have.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now I understand that that I just summarized the entire article but I feel it is worth reiterating again and again and.....&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 10:50:10 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>rwmcpar</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1118 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Response to George</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/blog/bridge-street/bridge-street-journal-3-13#comment-1116</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Good question - I devoted&amp;nbsp;Vol. 3.14 of the Bridge Street Journal to providing my thoughts.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:19:29 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bridge Street</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1116 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Who Planned Correctly?</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/blog/bridge-street/bridge-street-journal-3-13#comment-1113</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;So the question is who actually prepared for this financial drought? I think Goldman Sachs and BRK did.  Any other financials?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:01:23 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1113 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
