<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.valueinvestingnews.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Value Investing News - FDC - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/stock-tickers/fdc</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;FDC&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Market reacted positively to</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/western-union-q4-net-slips#comment-261</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Market reacted positively to the news. WU up 5% today!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 18:11:59 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 261 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>WU: Maybe not</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/be-patient-western-union-will-deliver#comment-168</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The stock closed today at $22.33.  If the market corrects, you might get an opportunity to get in on this excellent opportunity.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 16:25:21 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 168 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>WU:  too late, now?</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/be-patient-western-union-will-deliver#comment-167</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Wow, in predicting a $23 stock, this article (from October) turned out to be prescience.  I guess it is too late to buy, now (January &#039;07).  It doesn’t appear to be a traditional value stock with a PE of 19x.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 11:19:50 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Leadsteer</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 167 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>True, Some Were</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/western-union-one-of-the-most-quiet-spin-offs-ever#comment-2</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I agree there was some reporting. However, this was a very large spin-off of a well-known brand name. The Western Union name (and business) is well-known. The spin-off is huge. For those reasons, I was really surprised by how little attention this spin-off got.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the other hand, the &lt;strong&gt;Hanes (HBI)&lt;/strong&gt; spin-off didn&#039;t get a lot of attention apart from the larger &lt;strong&gt;Sara Lee (SLE) &lt;/strong&gt; story, which - in my view - is actually the less interesting situation. So, this isn&#039;t solely a &lt;strong&gt; Western Union (WU) &lt;/strong&gt; thing alone. Spin-offs in general get less attention than they should, because they really do provide a lot of interesting investment opportunities.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What surprised me was the lack of attention given the size and name recognition. I guess a spin-off just isn&#039;t as exciting as an IPO. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt; By the way, the Contributor&#039;s Corner is a great resource that mentions a lot of under-reported situations. So, it&#039;s really in a different league regarding such special situations. &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:22:13 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Western Union - Some were watching</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/western-union-one-of-the-most-quiet-spin-offs-ever#comment-1</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I reported on the Western Union spinoff to the member of Fat Pitch Financials Contributor&#039;s Corner.  Though reporting was a bit light on this one, I still saw several references to this spinoff last week.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 17:06:03 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
