<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.valueinvestingnews.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Value Investing News - hnr - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/stock-tickers/hnr</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;hnr&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Yes marine Iagree.Thats why</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/bloomberg-interviews-with-mohnish-pabrai#comment-1220</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Yes marine Iagree.Thats why I disagreed with his investment in Delta Financial&amp;nbsp; this summer BEFORE IT DECLARED BANKRUPTCY. The subprime mess was &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; when he invested but instead of staying clear of it he seems to like UNCERTAINTITY which a value investor like Buffett would never do.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 08:05:07 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>billytickets</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1220 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I think Pabrai make some</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/bloomberg-interviews-with-mohnish-pabrai#comment-1219</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I think Pabrai make some very insightful points: return of capital is more important than return on capital, low risk and high uncertainty approach, looking for Value, day-to-day fluctuations are mostly noise and more.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 07:08:46 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>galin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1219 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Good good good!
</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/bloomberg-interviews-with-mohnish-pabrai#comment-695</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Good good good!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 00:15:03 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 695 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Thanks I added this to my</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/breakdown-of-hnr-financials#comment-661</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks I added this to my CAPS picks!  I am already long HNR but I had forgotten about them for the time being.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 19:36:51 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 661 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Agreed, how and when would</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/magic-formula-major-insight#comment-241</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed, how and when would you implement it?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:34:36 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 241 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>It wouldn&#039;t be a very</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/magic-formula-major-insight#comment-236</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It wouldn&#039;t be a very &quot;scientific&quot; test, but it should be a decent indicator.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mr. Greenblatts screen identifies very well managed companies, so it should be a &quot;no-brainer&quot; to purchase those companies when they are selling at their own historical lows. In my opinion, the best matrix to gauge a company is against itself.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After all, you could buy the best managed company in the world, but it is still a terrible investment if it is purchased at too high of price.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 08:59:24 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 236 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I think that might be a great idea</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/magic-formula-major-insight#comment-230</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I think that might be a great idea too, but how do you suggest we test that?  A poor performing stock could hit a new low daily- when would the buyer pull the trigger?  Are you suggesting that if it is on the screen and at at 52 week low that it should be selected?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 12:15:53 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 230 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>What about only purchasing</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/magic-formula-major-insight#comment-215</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;What about only purchasing from the screen at their 52wk lows?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:51:26 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 215 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
