<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.valueinvestingnews.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Value Investing News - LLY - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/stock-tickers/lly</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;LLY&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>6 Investment Ideas for the ‘Obamanomics’ Era</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/investment-winners-and-losers-obama-administration#comment-1882</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Martin Hutchinson analyses what a Democrat landslide means for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/6-investment-ideas-for-the-obamanomics-era/7951&quot;&gt; stock market investing&lt;/a&gt;. He says nuclear and clean energy stocks, auto manufacturers, generic drug producers and muni bonds are a “buy”. But fossil fuel companies and financial institutions should be avoided.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 11:33:18 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>MurrayRothbard</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1882 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Yeah I Like These Kinds of Stories</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/the-biotech-industry-30-years-of-failure#comment-381</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Sometimes it&#039;s worth taking a longer view of industries. The economics of certain industries are just so different - it&#039;s something investors need to learn. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You can&#039;t outrun the mistakes of your dumbest competitor, just ask the airlines. The propsects of tremendous growth and hitting it big sometimes lead to capital being pushed into industries that (from a business perspective) already have more than enough. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of course, everyone outside the industry gets to benefit from it. We&#039;ve all benefited from profitless airlines. As I write this I&#039;m benefiting from all the money that&#039;s been poured into the telecom area. It used to be you had to pay very high monthly fees for dial-up internet access. Now, I have high speed access for less than $0 when you consider my phone, cable, and internet together cost me much less than they did separately. For this, I have the fierce competition between Verizon, Cablevision, etc. to thank. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of course, my hometown used to be filled with thousands of AT&amp;amp;T employees (it was the world HQ) - and they&#039;re all gone. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Competition is a funny thing. And growth is an even funnier thing. Investors chase the prospect even when (like in these situations) it hasn&#039;t been all that profitable in the aggregate.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:14:05 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 381 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I&#039;m glad this one got refreshed.</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/the-biotech-industry-30-years-of-failure#comment-378</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Consider the following observation; from the year 1975 through 2004 the biotech industry as a whole has seen an increasing trend in sales, but total operating income before depreciation is essentially zero.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-Wow!  I wouldn&#039;t have guessed that...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;So not only is big pharma more efficient at producing and selling, but the gap is increasing, not narrowing. There is no evidence that the biotech industry is learning.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;...or this. Then again, I live in the biotech capital of the world.  Or so it seems.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:31:53 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 378 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
