<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.valueinvestingnews.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Value Investing News - C - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/stock-tickers/c</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;C&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>tontine</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/whitney-tilson-talks-about-13-fs#comment-1486</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The returns at Tontine have been strong for a while. They rode the homebuilders for a long time and have made money in E&amp;amp;C lately. But if you check out their 13F, I am sure you can find some ideas. I think they file under Jeff Gendell. Superficially, looks like picking up some financial exposure, some airlines and select tech themes, though I promise nothing of my reading of this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;http://sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1056581/000090266408001348/p08-0594form13fhr.txt&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 10:07:44 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>savagegraham</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1486 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Link to source, please</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/whitney-tilson-talks-about-13-fs#comment-1482</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I just noticed that this Tilson video was posted earlier &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/whitney-tilson-13-f-filings-superinvesto&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. Please vote up that article by following the previous link. Given the discussion here, there is no need to change your vote on this entry.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please remember to link directly to the source in order to avoid duplicate reporting. VIN can tell if a link has been posted previously, but it can&#039;t detect duplicate content if you link to indirect sources.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:15:08 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1482 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I have not heard of them</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/whitney-tilson-talks-about-13-fs#comment-1477</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I have not heard of them until that show.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;http://www.contrarianvalueinvesting.com/&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:21:45 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>alexg</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1477 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>tontine partners lp</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/whitney-tilson-talks-about-13-fs#comment-1476</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Anyone follow this these investors?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:34:33 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1476 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Be sure not to miss this</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/doubting-lampert-again#comment-1395</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Be sure not to miss this last quote in the article:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;margin-left: 40px&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;He did really well on Autozone,&amp;rdquo; said Bruce Greenwald, a professor of finance and economics at Columbia University. &amp;ldquo;Most of his stocks are retail stocks, and he has done really well with them. So he decided he was a genius at retail, and it didn&amp;rsquo;t occur to him he could be wrong about it. He believed his own press.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ouch, that comment by Greenwald has got to hurt.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 19:51:46 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1395 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I&#039;m glad people enjoyed</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/enjoy-bubbles-while-they-last#comment-1330</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m glad people enjoyed this.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 02:31:05 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mark Perkins</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1330 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Reply</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/blog/bridge-street/bridge-street-journal-3-13#comment-1118</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Although GS will come out a major winner lets not forget that they managed to be only one step ahead. While Wall Street was talking about CDOs they just recognized that it was bad and took it one step further. BRK on the other hand has maintained a level of standard that is unparalleled. I think it goes to show the incredible restraint that Buffet and Co. have.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now I understand that that I just summarized the entire article but I feel it is worth reiterating again and again and.....&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 10:50:10 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>rwmcpar</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1118 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Response to George</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/blog/bridge-street/bridge-street-journal-3-13#comment-1116</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Good question - I devoted&amp;nbsp;Vol. 3.14 of the Bridge Street Journal to providing my thoughts.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:19:29 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bridge Street</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1116 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Who Planned Correctly?</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/blog/bridge-street/bridge-street-journal-3-13#comment-1113</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;So the question is who actually prepared for this financial drought? I think Goldman Sachs and BRK did.  Any other financials?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:01:23 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1113 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I&#039;ve been following John&#039;s</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/citigroup-to-offer-to-buy-more-than-50-of-nikko-cordial#comment-357</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve been following John&#039;s commentary on Nikko Cordial for a while.  I recommend the whole series of posts he&#039;s written on it.  The situation has become quite interesting.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 12:17:45 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 357 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I agree</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/citigroup-to-offer-to-buy-more-than-50-of-nikko-cordial#comment-359</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;John&#039;s blog, Controlled Greed, is an absolute must read for anyone who holds any of the same stocks he does or is thinking about buying any of the stocks he owns. He follows them so well and writes about them so clearly, he will help any who happens to be of like mind.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He has a unique blog. It excels in this sort of thing. Everyone should check out the portfolio (he presents it right on the site) and if you happen to hold any of the same stocks - or are thinking about any of his stocks - you have to bookmark the site and read every post he writes. It&#039;s worth it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 11:16:49 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 359 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Pretty Good Article</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/buying-the-china-syndrome#comment-335</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;George,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The article is pretty good, but the quote you pulled out is great. It really asks the right question.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:44:03 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 335 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
