<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.valueinvestingnews.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Value Investing News - Top 10 Net/Nets Four Years Later - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/top-10-net-nets-four-years-later</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Top 10 Net/Nets Four Years Later&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>You&#039;re right at current</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/top-10-net-nets-four-years-later#comment-326</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;You&#039;re right at current market valuations they seem almost impossible to find.  What would Graham do?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 22:21:55 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 326 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Great Find</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/top-10-net-nets-four-years-later#comment-324</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I love reading results for net/nets - you can&#039;t find many these days and you don&#039;t see them written about much.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 21:21:43 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 324 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Top 10 Net/Nets Four Years Later</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/top-10-net-nets-four-years-later</link>
 <description>Excerpt: &quot;We recently discovered an interesting relic, (interesting in our minds anyway) that being a complete list of net/nets from early February 2003, when we initially launched this site. There were more than 500 companies on this list, some legitimate, and some destined for the scrap heap. We thought it would be a worthy exercise to see how the top ten net/nets by market cap fared in subsequent years. The results were very positive, exceeding even our expectations.&quot;</description>
 <comments>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/top-10-net-nets-four-years-later#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/stock-tickers/bwng">bwng</category>
 <category domain="http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/stock-tickers/cc">cc</category>
 <category domain="http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/stock-tickers/corv">corv</category>
 <category domain="http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/stock-tickers/ets">ets</category>
 <category domain="http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/stock-tickers/infs">INFS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/stock-tickers/npk">NPK</category>
 <category domain="http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/stock-tickers/ntrt">NTRT</category>
 <category domain="http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/stock-tickers/nufo">nufo</category>
 <category domain="http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/stock-tickers/vclk">vclk</category>
 <category domain="http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/stock-tickers/voxx">VOXX</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 19:31:58 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">640 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
