<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.valueinvestingnews.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Value Investing News - Value and Growth Investing: Review and Update - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/value-and-growth-investing-review-and-up</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Value and Growth Investing: Review and Update&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Value and Growth Investing: Review and Update</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/value-and-growth-investing-review-and-up</link>
 <description>Link to a PDF of the complete Chan and Lakonishok 2004 article. From the abstract: &quot;The evidence suggests that, even after taking into account the experience of the late 1990s, value investing generates superior returns. Common measures of risk do not support the argument that the return differential is a result of the higher riskiness of value stocks. Instead, behavioral considerations and the agency costs of delegated investment management lie at the root of the value-growth spread.&quot;</description>
 <comments>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/value-and-growth-investing-review-and-up#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/category/behavioral-finance">Behavioral Finance</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 09:11:42 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4430 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
