<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.valueinvestingnews.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Value Investing News -  Schwab Chart: Builder Confidence vs. S&amp;amp;P 500 - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/schwab-chart-builder-confidence-vs-s-p-500</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot; Schwab Chart: Builder Confidence vs. S&amp;P 500&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Home Building is accurate</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/schwab-chart-builder-confidence-vs-s-p-500#comment-71</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I think this holds true - somewhat.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the economy is in the dumps, people obviously aren&#039;t going to splurge on building a home.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What I don&#039;t like is, how can builders forecast demand?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 17:47:32 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 71 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title> Schwab Chart: Builder Confidence vs. S&amp;P 500</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/schwab-chart-builder-confidence-vs-s-p-500</link>
 <description>Nice explanation of how even &quot;experts&quot; (like Schwab, CNN Money) can present misleading information. In this case, something called &quot;forced correlation&quot;. More evidence supporting the argument that you should always do your own research.</description>
 <comments>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/schwab-chart-builder-confidence-vs-s-p-500#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/category/commentary">Commentary</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 13:50:43 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ricemutt</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">293 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
