<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.valueinvestingnews.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Value Investing News - Bridge Street Journal 3.13: The Financials and the Scriptures - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/blog/bridge-street/bridge-street-journal-3-13</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Bridge Street Journal 3.13: The Financials and the Scriptures&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Reply</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/blog/bridge-street/bridge-street-journal-3-13#comment-1118</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Although GS will come out a major winner lets not forget that they managed to be only one step ahead. While Wall Street was talking about CDOs they just recognized that it was bad and took it one step further. BRK on the other hand has maintained a level of standard that is unparalleled. I think it goes to show the incredible restraint that Buffet and Co. have.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now I understand that that I just summarized the entire article but I feel it is worth reiterating again and again and.....&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 10:50:10 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>rwmcpar</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1118 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Response to George</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/blog/bridge-street/bridge-street-journal-3-13#comment-1116</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Good question - I devoted&amp;nbsp;Vol. 3.14 of the Bridge Street Journal to providing my thoughts.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:19:29 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bridge Street</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1116 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Who Planned Correctly?</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/blog/bridge-street/bridge-street-journal-3-13#comment-1113</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;So the question is who actually prepared for this financial drought? I think Goldman Sachs and BRK did.  Any other financials?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:01:23 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1113 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bridge Street Journal 3.13: The Financials and the Scriptures</title>
 <link>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/blog/bridge-street/bridge-street-journal-3-13</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Yahoo Finance &lt;a href=&quot;http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/071129/e_trade_citadel.html&quot;&gt;reports &lt;/a&gt;that E-Trade Financial is selling a $2.5B stake to a private equity firm (Citadel) and firing its CEO.&amp;nbsp; It seems that financial writers can make a template with fields like &quot;Company Name,&quot; &quot;Amount of Writedown,&quot;&amp;nbsp;&quot;Amount of Cash Infusion,&quot; &quot;Percent of Stake Sold,&quot; and&amp;nbsp;&quot;Name of Ousted CEO,&quot; and then have Microsoft Word automatically generate a story upon each day&#039;s news.&amp;nbsp; It was only a few days ago that Citigroup announced it sold a $7.5B stake to the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/nov2007/gb20071127_878991.htm-campaign_id=yhoo&quot;&gt;here&#039;s &lt;/a&gt;the story from Businessweek).&amp;nbsp; Freddie Mac, meanwhile, halved its dividend AND raised cash via a stock offering AFTER already selling off&amp;nbsp;assets to raise capital&amp;nbsp;(as recounted &lt;a href=&quot;http://biz.yahoo.com/rb/071128/freddiemac_stocks.html-.v=4&quot;&gt;here &lt;/a&gt;in this unintentionally hilarious article that focuses on the fact that FRE had its biggest one-day price gain in 19 years - but omits to note that the gain comes after the company&#039;s shares fell off the face of the world).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All of that leads to an important lesson.&amp;nbsp; In the scriptures, when the Pharoah of Egypt promoted Joseph from prisoner to Director of the Department of Drought Planning (they knew they&#039;d have seven years of good times before having seven years of drought), Joseph immediately began setting aside crops for the coming drought.&amp;nbsp; Not heeding that lesson gets firms into the position recounted in the preceding paragraph: needing to sell shares and assets when things are bad.&amp;nbsp; Companies go public at the top of a market for a reason - they can sell equity stakes at a high price.&amp;nbsp; C and FRE&#039;s sale of equity/ assets&amp;nbsp;comes at the BOTTOM of a cycle - the worst time to sell.&amp;nbsp; But, they didn&#039;t store up in the good times, a la Joseph, so they don&#039;t have the luxury of choosing when to sell.&amp;nbsp; They should have read the scriptures&amp;nbsp;- they&#039;d have noted that,&amp;nbsp;when the drought came, Egypt&#039;s good planning&amp;nbsp;not only ensured food for its own people, but allowed it to sell to neighboring nations - presumably for great profits.&amp;nbsp; Such is the luxury of good planning - you can choose your buying/ selling instead of having the market choose for you.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/blog/bridge-street/bridge-street-journal-3-13#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/stock-tickers/c">C</category>
 <category domain="http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/stock-tickers/etfc">ETFC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/stock-tickers/fre">FRE</category>
 <category domain="http://www.valueinvestingnews.com/stock-tickers/msft">MSFT</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:33:46 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bridge Street</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2343 at http://www.valueinvestingnews.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
