Book Review: Rule # 1
By George on Tue, 2006-11-21 09:30
(via valueblogreview.blogspot.com)
ValueBlogReview provides a brief review of Phil Town's book, Rule #1. Get the bottom line on what this book is all about by reading this concise overview, which includes an on the mark assessment of the good and bad points of this book.
Recent comments
- Hi,
Sandra here from Canada.
29 min 58 sec ago - packers and movers delhi
2 hours 19 min ago - Twitter is a great source
2 hours 33 min ago - Hi,
Jade here from Canada. As
18 hours 15 min ago - Thanks for the post. It will
2 days 4 hours ago - Small business owners use
4 days 2 hours ago - book is now in paperback, hardcover, and large-print edition
4 days 7 hours ago - Intelligent Speculation
1 week 20 hours ago - A book summary is posted on youtube
4 weeks 20 hours ago - link to book site on lulu.com
5 weeks 1 day ago
I've had the same feelings as Jason. I guess I would be more comfortable reading Rule #1 if I had a way to review Phil Town's past investment record.
I would not totally disagree with that statement.
For some, they will read and follow the book, buy every service recommended, and lose that money as well as the money invested.
For others who read things with a set of filters in place, a smy review states this is a good book to get started.
The book actually does a good job of explaining how to do a DCF both using a spredsheet and in your head.
Therefore overall if one ignores the "commercial" sales pitch for services and products the book helps a new investor grasp the key Graham/Fisher/Buffett concepts: Buy a strong balance sheet company, that is growing, for a discount. What the book advocates is not wrong, it is that simple. The biggest problem of the book is that it may appear to many to be easy. It is not.
I don't know what it is, but whenever I hear about this book, it conjures up feelings of "scam!". For some reason, I feel like it's those infomercials that show the people that "work at home and make $5000 a week selling stuff on eBay".
I guess I just prefer the analytical approach to everything: "This is how you calculate DCF", etc.